Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
BMC Med ; 21(1): 78, 2023 02 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286473

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines have shown high efficacy against COVID-19 in randomized controlled trials. However, their comparative effectiveness against COVID-19 is unclear in the real world. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against COVID-19 in the UK general population. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using IQVIA Medical Research Database (IMRD), an electronic primary care database from the UK (2021). We included 1,311,075 participants, consisting of 637,549 men and 673,526 women age≥18 years, who received vaccination with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 between January 1 and August 31, 2021. The outcomes consisted of confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalisation for COVID-19 and death from COVID-19 in the IMRD. We performed a cox-proportional hazard model to compare the risk of each outcome variable between the two vaccines adjusting for potential confounders with time-stratified overlap weighting of propensity score (PS). RESULTS: During a mean of 6.7 months of follow-up, 20,070 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in individuals who received BNT162b2 vaccine (PS weighted incidence rate: 3.65 per 1000 person-months), and 31,611 SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in those who received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (PS weighted incidence rate: 5.25 per 1000 person-months). The time-stratified PS weighted rate difference of SARS-CoV-2 infection for BNT162b2 group vs. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group was -1.60 per 1000 person-months (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.76 to -1.43 per 1000 person-months), and the hazard ratio was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.71). The results were similar across the stratum of sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years), and study periods (i.e., alpha-variant predominance period and delta-variant predominance period). The PS weighted incidence of hospitalisation for COVID-19 was also lower in the BNT162b2 vaccine group than that in the ChAdOx1 vaccine group (RD: -0.09, 95%CI: -0.13 to -0.05 per 1000 person-months; HR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.57 to 0.74). No significant difference in the risk of death from COVID-19 was observed between the two comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, the BNT162b2 vaccine appears to be more efficacious than the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation for COVID-19 but not death from COVID-19.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2237127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Gout patients often have multiple comorbidities, making them susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and poor outcomes. This study was undertaken to examine the association between gout and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes, especially in patients who have received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. METHODS: We conducted 2 cohort studies using The Health Improvement Network in the UK. Individuals with gout and those without gout from the general population were followed up from December 8, 2020 to October 31, 2021. We estimated the rate difference (RD) and hazard ratio (HR) of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes (i.e., hospitalization and death within 30 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection) for individuals with gout versus those without gout using a Cox proportional hazards model according to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status. We adjusted for potential confounders by using overlap weighting of exposure scores. RESULTS: Among the vaccinated cohort, 1,955 cases of breakthrough COVID-19 infection occurred in 54,576 individuals with gout (4.68 cases per 1,000 person-months), and 52,468 cases occurred in 1,336,377 individuals without gout (3.76 cases per 1,000 person-months). The partially adjusted RD of breakthrough infection was 0.91 cases per 1,000 person-months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.62-1.20 cases per 1,000 person-months), and the partially adjusted HR was 1.24 (95% CI 1.19-1.30). Gout was also associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.30 [95% CI 1.10-1.53]) and death (adjusted HR 1.36 [95% CI 0.87-2.13]). Women with gout had an increased risk of hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.55 [95% CI 1.15-2.10]) and death (adjusted HR 2.46 [95% CI 1.12-5.41]). Similar associations with gout were observed in the unvaccinated cohort. CONCLUSION: These general population data suggest that individuals with gout, especially women, have higher risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes, even when vaccinated.

3.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; PP2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2119284

ABSTRACT

Dataset auditing for machine learning (ML) models is a method to evaluate if a given dataset is used in training a model. In a Federated Learning setting where multiple institutions collaboratively train a model with their decentralized private datasets, dataset auditing can facilitate the enforcement of regulations, which provide rules for preserving privacy, but also allow users to revoke authorizations and remove their data from collaboratively trained models. This paper first proposes a set of requirements for a practical dataset auditing method, and then present a novel dataset auditing method called Ensembled Membership Auditing (EMA). Its key idea is to leverage previously proposed Membership Inference Attack methods and to aggregate data-wise membership scores using statistic testing to audit a dataset for a ML model. We have experimentally evaluated the proposed approach with benchmark datasets, as well as 4 X-ray datasets (CBIS-DDSM, COVIDx, Child-XRay, and CXR-NIH) and 3 dermatology datasets (DERM7pt, HAM10000, and PAD-UFES-20). Our results show that EMA meet the requirements substantially better than the previous state-of-the-art method. Our code is at: https://github.com/Hazelsuko07/EMA.

4.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 9: 781267, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1957146

ABSTRACT

Background: The symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) range from moderate to critical conditions, leading to death in some patients, and the early warning indicators of the COVID-19 progression and the occurrence of its serious complications such as myocardial injury are limited. Methods: We carried out a multi-center, prospective cohort study in three hospitals in Wuhan. Genome-wide 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) profiles in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was used to identify risk factors for COVID-19 pneumonia and develop a machine learning model using samples from 53 healthy volunteers, 66 patients with moderate COVID-19, 99 patients with severe COVID-19, and 38 patients with critical COVID-19. Results: Our warning model demonstrated that an area under the curve (AUC) for 5hmC warning moderate patients developed into severe status was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.85) and for severe patients developed into critical status was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.96). We further built a warning model on patients with and without myocardial injury with the AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.95). Conclusion: This is the first study showing the utility of 5hmC as an accurate early warning marker for disease progression and myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19. Our results show that phosphodiesterase 4D and ten-eleven translocation 2 may be important markers in the progression of COVID-19 disease.

5.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0270034, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1910668

ABSTRACT

There remains a limited understanding of the HIV prevention and treatment needs among female sex workers in many parts of the world. Systematic reviews of existing literature can help fill this gap; however, well-done systematic reviews are time-demanding and labor-intensive. Here, we propose an automatic document classification approach to a systematic review to significantly reduce the effort in reviewing documents and optimizing empiric decision making. We first describe a manual document classification procedure that is used to curate a pertinent training dataset and then propose three classifiers: a keyword-guided method, a cluster analysis-based method, and a random forest approach that utilizes a large set of feature tokens. This approach is used to identify documents studying female sex workers that contain content relevant to either HIV or experienced violence. We compare the performance of the three classifiers by cross-validation in terms of area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic and precision and recall plot, and found random forest approach reduces the amount of manual reading for our example by 80%; in sensitivity analysis, we found that even trained with only 10% of data, the classifier can still avoid reading 75% of future documents (68% of total) while retaining 80% of relevant documents. In sum, the automated procedure of document classification presented here could improve both the precision and efficiency of systematic reviews and facilitate live reviews, where reviews are updated regularly. We expect to obtain a reasonable classifier by taking 20% of retrieved documents as training samples. The proposed classifier could also be used for more meaningfully assembling literature in other research areas and for rapid documents screening with a tight schedule, such as COVID-related work during the crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , HIV Infections , Sex Workers , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Female , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , ROC Curve
6.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 56: 152059, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1907762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Routine vaccinations are associated with an increased risk of gout flares. We examined the association between COVID-19 vaccination, an immunization program implemented to a large proportion of population, and the risk of gout flares. METHODS: We conducted a time-stratified case-crossover study among patients with gout who experienced gout flares between December 2020 and September 2021, using data from The Health Improvement Network. We compared the risk of gout flares on each of the seven days on and after the day of COVID-19 vaccination vs. no vaccination during that period using conditional logistic regression. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses stratified by different COVID-19 vaccines (i.e., BNT162b2, hereafter referred to as BNT, and ChAdOx1 nCov-19, hereafter referred to as ChAd). RESULTS: Among 5,904 patients with gout (mean age: 63·1 years; 85·5% male) who experienced gout flares within one month, the risk of gout flares slightly increased on the second day after COVID-19 vaccination (odds ratio: 1·44; 95% CI: 1·02 to 2·07). The risk of gout flares also slightly increased after receiving COVID-19 vaccine on other remaining days (ORs ranged from 1·03 to 1·22); however, none of them was statistically significant. An increased risk of gout flares on the second day after vaccination was mainly observed for the ChAd vaccine (odds ratio: 1·44; 95% CI: 1·00 to 2·05), but not for BNT vaccine (odds ratio: 1·18; 95% CI: 0·67 to 2·02). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination, mainly ChAd vaccination, slightly increases the risk of gout flares on the second day after vaccination. This finding reassures the safety of COVID-19 vaccination for patients with gout.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , Gout , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Gout/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Symptom Flare Up
7.
Environ Int ; 165: 107299, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851026

ABSTRACT

Melamine (MEL) and its derivatives are increasingly applied as nitrogenous flame retardants in consumer products. Nevertheless, limited information is available on their environmental occurrence and subsequent human exposure via multiple exposure pathways. In this study, we analysed MEL and its derivatives in dust (indication of the dust ingestion route) and hand wipe samples (indication of the hand-to-mouth route) collected in various microenvironments. The levels of ∑MELs in both dust (median: 24,100 ng/g) and participant hand samples (803 ng/m2) collected in e-waste dismantling workshops were significantly higher than those in samples collected in homes (15,600 ng/g and 196 ng/m2, respectively), dormitories (13,100 ng/g and 227 ng/m2, respectively) and hotel rooms (11,800 ng/g and 154 ng/m2, respectively). Generally, MEL dominated in dust samples collected in e-waste dismantling workshops, whereas cyanuric acid dominated in hand wipe samples. This may occur partly because the latter is an ingredient in disinfection products, which are more frequently employed in daily lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exposure assessment suggests that dust ingestion is an important exposure pathway among dismantling workers and the general population, whereas hand-to-mouth contact could not be overlooked in certain populations, such as children and dismantling workers not wear gloves at work.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Electronic Waste , Child , Dust/analysis , Eating , Electronic Waste/analysis , Humans , Mouth , Pandemics , Triazines
8.
Front Microbiol ; 13: 735363, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1809432

ABSTRACT

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the performance of nanopore amplicon sequencing detection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in clinical samples. Method: We carried out a single-center, prospective cohort study in a Wuhan hospital and collected a total of 86 clinical samples, including 54 pharyngeal swabs, 31 sputum samples, and 1 fecal sample, from 86 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from Feb 20 to May 15, 2020. We performed parallel detection with nanopore-based genome amplification and sequencing (NAS) on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) minION platform and routine reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In addition, 27 negative control samples were detected using the two methods. The sensitivity and specificity of NAS were evaluated and compared with those of RT-qPCR. Results: The viral read number and reference genome coverage were both significantly different between the two groups of samples, and the latter was a better indicator for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Based on the reference genome coverage, NAS revealed both high sensitivity (96.5%) and specificity (100%) compared with RT-qPCR (80.2 and 96.3%, respectively), although the samples had been stored for half a year before the detection. The total time cost was less than 15 h, which was acceptable compared with that of RT-qPCR (∼2.5 h). In addition, the reference genome coverage of the viral reads was in line with the cycle threshold value of RT-qPCR, indicating that this number could also be used as an indicator of the viral load in a sample. The viral load in sputum might be related to the severity of the infection, particularly in patients within 4 weeks after onset of clinical manifestations, which could be used to evaluate the infection. Conclusion: Our results showed the high sensitivity and specificity of the NAS method for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with RT-qPCR. The sequencing results were also used as an indicator of the viral load to display the viral dynamics during infection. This study proved the wide application prospect of nanopore sequencing detection for SARS-CoV-2 and may more knowledge about the clinical characteristics of COVID-19.

9.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 74(5): 741-747, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1556247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at an increased risk of acquiring infections owing to immunologic dysfunction and use of potent immunomodulatory medications; however, few data are available on their risk of COVID-19. We estimated the rate of COVID-19 among RA participants and compared it with that of the general population. METHODS: Using the Health Improvement Network, we identified RA patients before February 2020 and followed them to September 2020. We calculated the rate of COVID-19 among participants with RA and compared it with that of the general population using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for potential confounders using overlap weighting of exposure score. We repeated the same analysis among participants with osteoarthritis, a nonautoimmune rheumatic disease, as a negative control exposure. RESULTS: We identified 225 cases of suspected and confirmed COVID-19 among 17,268 RA patients, and 14,234 cases among 1,616,600 participants in the general population (1.4 versus 0.9/1,000 person-months), with the adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj ) being 1.19 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.04-1.36). Confirmed COVID-19 cases developed in 46 RA participants and in 2,249 in the general population (0.3 versus 0.1/1,000 person-months), with the HRadj being 1.42 (95% CI 1.01-1.95). No statistically significant difference was observed for suspected and confirmed (HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.07]) or confirmed (HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.92-1.27]) COVID-19 rates between participants with osteoarthritis and the general population. CONCLUSION: RA, but not osteoarthritis, was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19. Our findings provide timely evidence to support recommendations that booster vaccines and priority access to anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody treatments should be encouraged for RA patients.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , COVID-19 , Osteoarthritis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Osteoarthritis/complications , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models
10.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 29(4): 363-373, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373541

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of self-reported symptoms of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) in school students during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study in Nanjing, China, students (grades 1-12) from six randomly selected schools self-administered the online survey questionnaire about hours on electronic devices, outdoor activities, frequency and intensity of 17 CVS symptoms during virtual learning period of COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Among 2363 invited students, 2005 (84.8%) completed the survey. Mean (SD) age was 12 (3.0) years, 51% were male, 53% wore glasses, 56% did not know the 20-20-20 rule (take a 20 second break every 20 min of close work and gaze at objects at least 20 feet away) and 6.5% knew but never followed the 20-20-20 rule. Mean (SD) hours/day was 4.6 (3.4) for screen time and 1.2 (1.0) for outdoor activities. Total of 1543 (77.0%) students reported at least one CVS symptom (median = 4) with eye dryness and itching the most common (48%). In multivariable analysis, CVS score 4 or more was independently associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.05 for per-year increase, p = 0.02), children with myopia not wearing glasses (aOR = 2.12, p = 0.0003), astigmatism (aOR = 1.37, p = 0.04), other ocular diseases (aOR = 1.59, p = 0.005), not complying 20-20-20 rule (aOR = 2.13, p = 0.04), more screen time (aOR = 1.53 for >6 vs. ≤2 hours, p = 0.0001) and less outdoor activities (aOR = 1.37 for ≤0.6 vs. ≥1.9 hours, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19 pandemic, self-reported CVS symptoms occurred in more than three-quarters of students. Besides pre-existing ocular diseases, children with myopia not wearing glasses, excessive time on screens, non-compliance of the 20-20-20 rule and reduced outdoor activities were associated with higher risk of CVS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myopia , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , China/epidemiology , Computers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Myopia/epidemiology , Pandemics , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Self Report , Students , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Ann Palliat Med ; 10(6): 6661-6668, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1296310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a serious infectious respiratory disease widespread worldwide. Nurses are the front-line staff in contact with infected patients and play a key role in treating patients and controlling the epidemic. The purpose of this study was to share our nursing team's experience in the treatment of COVID-19 and provide clinical guidance. METHODS: Detail nursing system arrangement was laid down: (I) reasonable division of ward channel was built; (II) effectively arranged human nursing resources and establishing special groups, including Training group, Critical patients nursing group, Quality control group, Epidemic preventive measures group, and Logistics support group; (III) optimize nursing workflow and establish various rules and regulations; (IV) scientific scheduling and humanized management; (V) pay attention to psychological support and adopt humanized management. The pre-job preparation, treatment results, and medical staff infection number were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-four intensive care nurses all passed the training with an average score of 99.75±0.13. One patient was dead, and 22 patients were discharged smoothly. The average length of stay was 9.12 days. The medical staff was not infected. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment center was set up and functioning rapidly, safely, and orderly by implementing an emergency management strategy. The goal of a high rescue rate, low mortality, and no medical staff infection was achieved. This nursing system could be applied in COVID-19 patient treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Coronavirus Infections , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Workflow
12.
BMJ Open ; 11(5): e048822, 2021 05 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1234305

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a set of disability weights (DWs) for COVID-19 symptoms, evaluate the disease burden of inpatients and analyse the characteristics and influencing factors of the disease. DESIGN: This was a multicentre retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: The medical records generated in three temporary military hospitals in Wuhan. PARTICIPANTS: Medical records of 2702 inpatients generated from 5 February to 5 April 2020 were randomly selected for this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: DWs of COVID-19 symptoms were determined by the person trade-off approach. The inpatients' medical records were analysed and used to calculate the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The mean DALY was evaluated across sex and age groups. The relationship between DALY and age, sex, body mass index, length of hospital stay, symptom duration before admission and native place was determined by multiple linear regression. RESULTS: For the DALY of each inpatient, severe expiratory dyspnoea, mild cough and sore throat had the highest (0.399) and lowest (0.004) weights, respectively. The average synthetic DALY and daily DALY were 2.29±1.33 and 0.18±0.15 days, respectively. Fever and fatigue contributed the most DALY at 31.36%, whereas nausea and vomiting and anxiety and depression contributed the least at 7.05%. There were significant differences between sex and age groups in both synthetic and daily DALY. Age, body mass index, length of hospital stay and symptom duration before admission were strongly related to both synthetic and daily DALY. CONCLUSIONS: Although the disease burden was higher among women than men, their daily disease burdens were similar. The disease burden in the younger population was higher than that in the older population. Treatment at the hospitals relieved the disease burden efficiently, while a delay in hospitalisation worsened it.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals, Military , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
13.
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology ; 30(21):3201-3205, 2020.
Article in Chinese | GIM | ID: covidwho-995505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish a set of disability weights(DWs) for symptoms of COVID-19 infection so as to evaluate the burden due to symptoms of hospitalized patients and analyze the related factors for the burden. METHODS: The items of symptoms were identified by literature review and questionnaire survey for medical staff. Set the DWs of WHO global burden of disease projects as benchmark, DWs of the symptom items were determined by analytical hierarchy process. The medical records of the patients with COVID-19 of Taikang Tongji(Wuhan) Hospital were reviewed, the related data were extracted by using text mining software. Then, the disability adjusted life years(DALYs) of the patients were calculated. The means of DALY between gender groups and the means of DALY between age groups were tested by variance analysis. Multivariate linear regression model analysis was performed for the correlation between DALY and age, body mass index, length of hospital stay and duration of symptoms before the admission. RESULTS The DWs of symptoms of COVID-19 were obtained, while DALY of each patient was calculated. The synthetic DALY was(3.49+/-2.09) days, and the average of daily DALY was(0.27+/-0.21) days. There were significant differences in the synthetic DALY and average of daily DALY between the gender groups and between the age groups(P<0.05). The synthetic DALY and average of daily DALY were associated with the age, BMI, length of hospital stay and duration of duration of symptoms before the admission(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The symptoms of COVID-19 can lead to heavy burden. Generally, the burden of female patients is heavier than that of the male patients, but there is no significant difference in the average of daily burden. Taken the life value changing with age into account, the overall burden of the young patients is heavier than that of the aged patients. The hospitalization can effectively reduce the burden, but the delay of hospitalization may increase the burden.

14.
Transpl Int ; 33(9): 1040-1045, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-154623

ABSTRACT

To summarize measures for the prevention and control of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the department of kidney transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of outpatients and inpatients in the department of kidney transplantation from January 20 to March 1, 2020, and followed up the in-home kidney transplant recipients and those waiting for kidney transplantation through the Internet platform. Our department had formulated detailed prevention and control measures, mainly including kidney transplant outpatient management, kidney transplantation ward management, management of kidney transplant surgery, dialysis management of patients waiting for kidney transplantation, personal protection of medical staff, and follow-up management of discharged patients after kidney transplantation. During the epidemic period, there were no COVID-19 cases among 68 outpatient examined kidney transplant recipients, 32 hospitalized kidney transplant recipients, 19 patients waiting for kidney transplantation in hospital, and 30 medical staff. There were no COVID-19 cases among 160 follow-up recipients after kidney transplantation and 60 patients waiting for kidney transplantation. During the epidemic period, we implemented strict prevention and control measures and adjusted working methods and procedures to ensure safe and orderly work of the department.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , China/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Medical Staff, Hospital , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Isolation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL